Unless I’m greatly mistaken, you can’t smell me, though at the moment I’m much more fragrant than I was after an hour of vigorous exercise earlier in the day.
Technology does not yet allow you olfactory access to random bloggers.
Does that matter?
Let’s put aside, for the moment, some of the creepier implications and talk about what we’re doing to the kids. That’s the topic Pamela Paul raises in today’s NYT, in an opinion piece titled, “Reading, Writing and Video Games”. Ms. Paul makes a point I agree with. Or maybe it’s more accurate to say that she agrees with me; I’ve been making the point since I was in grad school studying instructional technology and she was a kid playing video games.
And no, I’m not going to yield to the temptation to wax geezerly (geezerish?) about the good old days of growing up with no video games, although – argh! – it’s so darned hard to resist.
Nevertheless.
The point – and I salute Ms. Paul for making it – is that there is a large contingent of folks pushing ever harder to integrate computers into schools for ever younger kids. The computer contingent holds the opinion that computer-based learning is both better (than more traditional kinds, one assumes) and downright necessary, even for kindergarteners.
As best I can tell, there are two groups pushing to raise a new generation of iTots. The first is, of course, the computer /software/ technology industry (I’m talking to you, Bill Gates). No big surprise there. What do you expect them to say?
The second – and I have some compassion for this group – is the parents, who, having found something that actually keeps the kids engaged, pretty much have to hope like hell that it actually IS good for them, because the alternative is just too unthinkable.
In the opposing camp, we have the overwhelming majority of people who actually know something about learning – the teaching community – and an equally overwhelming body of research about child development. The topic is not new. The facts have not changed.
But let’s not bog down in facts for the moment. Let’s get sensory.
Humans still have five senses. In case you’ve forgotten, these are: sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste. These faculties come in really, really handy for living in the actual world.
I know, I know, virtual reality, smell-o-vision, all these technologies with their splashy promises and truly astounding advances. I’m as dazzled as the rest of you, really, I am.
But let me put this to you in human terms. Circuitry is not chemistry. Your computer screen doesn’t hear the collective heartbeats of other people around you. The best simulations in the world can’t factor in the infinite range of stimuli we all encounter every day: the way your hands feel, clasped around a cold glass on a hot afternoon; how, even though they stopped making Twinkies, and you stopped eating them after the age of 10, you can still taste that impossibly spongy cake with that so-called “crème” filling, just reading these words, so much so you can still smell the school cafeteria that sold that delicious crap.
Or what about the woman who steps into the elevator and fills the closed space with her perfume, so that the scent lingers on your sleeve all day long? Will that scent haunt you all day, distracting you with amorous imaginings so that you blow the big presentation? Or will it make you annoyed and sneezy?
I remember something I learned a long time ago. In education classes we used to talk about poor kids who were raised in so-called “deprived” environments, but a wise professor pointed this out: all natural environments are rich with sensory stimuli. The only deprivation lies with kids whose adults don’t take the time to point out the sights and sounds and smells and tastes and touchability of the real world around them. If no one draws attention to those rich objects and inputs, children’s perceptions never get a chance to develop. Their very intelligence is stunted by a lack of sensory stimulation.
And now we’re saying, “Oh, never mind, everything you need is on this little screen”?
Maybe one day soon there’ll be a scratch-and-sniff app for us bloggers. Not only will you be able to smell me, but I can market my new perfume, a potent fragrance I’m concocting to capture the essence of what I’m feeling about all this.
I’m thinking of calling it “Appalled”.
Read Pamela Paul’s article HERE
As always, I invite you to visit my website and my YouTube channel.